Impact model: JULES-W2-DDM30

These simulations equal the ones provided as JULES-W2. The only difference in the model setup is the use of DDM30 as river routing network compared to the internal TRIP model in JULES-W2. Basic details on model setup and input data used can be found in the JULES-W2 entry [1].

[1] https://www.isimip.org/impactmodels/details/312/

ISIMIP3a

Person responsible for model simulations in this simulation round

Emmanouil Grillakis: egrillakis@tuc.gr, 0000-0002-4228-1803, Technical University of Crete (Greece)

Aristeidis Koutroulis: akoutroulis@tuc.gr, 0000-0002-2999-7575, Technical University of Crete (Greece)

Additional persons involved: Athanasios Tsilimingkras

Output Data

Experiments: obsclim_1901soc_1901co2, obsclim_2015soc_1901co2, obsclim_2015soc_default, counterclim_histsoc_default, obsclim_histsoc_1901co2, counterclim_1901soc_default, counterclim_2015soc_default, obsclim_1901soc_default, obsclim_histsoc_default
Climate Drivers: GSWP3-W5E5
Date: 2023-07-05

Resolution

Spatial aggregation: regular grid

Horizontal resolution: 0.5°x0.5°

Vertically resolved: No

Additional spatial aggregation & resolution information: DDM30 as river routing network compared to the internal TRIP model in JULES-W2

Temporal resolution of input data: climate variables: daily

Temporal resolution of input data: co2: annual

Temporal resolution of input data: land use/land cover: annual

Temporal resolution of input data: soil: constant

Input data

Observed atmospheric climate data sets used: GSWP3-W5E5 (ISIMIP3a)

Emissions data sets used: Atmospheric composition (ISIMIP3a)

Land use data sets used: Historical, gridded land use

Spin-up

Was a spin-up performed?: Yes

Spin-up design: According to 3a protocol

Routing

Runoff routing: River discharge is calculated with the DDM30 river topology.

Routing data: DDM30 provided by ISIMIP

Calibration

Was the model calibrated?: No

Vegetation

Is co2 fertilisation accounted for?: No